One thing I've learned from working with Frasier is that any site that supports a paper text needs to have a decent way to deal with errors in the existing book. An errata content type would be a good thing to have. It would need field for chapter, topic, sub-topic, figure id, and correction. Maybe more. Then we'd make a view of the errata sorted by page #. Nothing here that requires a module, but some cck and views work that could be included with the distribution might be a welcome thing. I actually don't know how much can be accomplished with a distribution. Need to look into that, but if distributions aren't the answer, I'm sure something else can be done. The idea of building out something that a lot of people will like out of the box is still valid, I think.
Errata
One thing I've learned from working with Frasier is that any site that supports a paper text needs to have a decent way to deal with errors in the existing book. An errata content type would be a good thing to have. It would need field for chapter, topic, sub-topic, figure id, and correction. Maybe more. Then we'd make a view of the errata sorted by page #. Nothing here that requires a module, but some cck and views work that could be included with the distribution might be a welcome thing. I actually don't know how much can be accomplished with a distribution. Need to look into that, but if distributions aren't the answer, I'm sure something else can be done. The idea of building out something that a lot of people will like out of the box is still valid, I think.
Becky Kinney